Search for: "1-8 Doe" Results 8921 - 8940 of 32,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2022, 6:14 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
” Thus, we find the State’s contract with the City did not relieve the State of its responsibilities under § 9-8-307(a)(1)(I) and (J). [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:31 pm by EB-5
 The problem is that, despite a $6,230 fee and an 8-month processing time, USCIS does not consider itself bound by any approval. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:00 pm
Truckers could drive up to 60 hours over 7 consecutive days, or 70 hours over 8 days. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 12:25 pm by jdowen
Cultivation of 1 kilogram or more, but less than 5 kilograms of marijuana is a 3rd degree felony, punishable by up to 36 months in prison and a fine not to exceed $10,000.00, unless the cultivation was done in the vicinity of a school or juvenile, in which case the offense is a 2nd degree felony, punishable by up to 8 years in prison, and a fine not to exceed $15,000.00 plus court costs. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Beyond Intractability
On the other hand, a court ruling could force the company to fix all problems associated with the bad product or even to remove it from the market.8 Read Article— 1 Stephen B. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:44 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
  Stated differently, I suggest that lawyers assume that the extended statute of limitations does NOT apply to simple traffic citations under the Tennessee Supreme Court weighs in on the issue. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 6:21 am by V. John Ella
The Court, in a 6 to 1 decision, held that Article 8 applied, but was not violated in this case. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It will consider whether a tort of malicious prosecution of civil proceedings does or should exist in English law. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:00 pm
Truckers could drive up to 60 hours over 7 consecutive days, or 70 hours over 8 days. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:09 am by Volker 'Falk' Metzler
  Especially the strong desire of (parts of) industry [1] and patent professionals [1][2][3], politically supported by JURI member Wikström and UK IP Minister Baroness Wilcox, to remove Articles 6 to 8 dealing with substantive patent law on patent infringement from the proposed Regulation appears to be still at stake (see also here or here). [read post]
The GC rejected all of the arguments put forward by Rolex and found that there was no likelihood of confusion between the two marks within the meaning of art. 8(1)(b) EUTMR. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 1:55 am by Darryl Hutcheson, Matrix
The majority contrasted the case at hand with ECHR cases such as Üner v Netherlands and X v Austria where the ECHR had considered the best interests of the child in determining the proportionality of an interference with parents’ rights under article 8 alone and article 8 combined with article 14. [read post]