Search for: "Does 1 through 12" Results 8921 - 8940 of 15,557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Articles 9-12 address the procedures by which extradition is to be accomplished. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 5:00 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/504(b-1)(1)(B) So, waiting to file for divorce or just after an anniversary may add or reduce years of maintenance owed in Illinois. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 4:19 am
Current employees who remain active through 2013 will earn a onetime retention payment of $775 in 2013 and $225 in 2014 in recognition of working without a wage increase for three years. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:45 am by Sheppard Mullin
 A married couple have a community property estate worth $12 million, and they have used up none of their estate tax exemptions through lifetime gifts. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:45 am by Sheppard Mullin
 A married couple have a community property estate worth $12 million, and they have used up none of their estate tax exemptions through lifetime gifts. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:45 am by Sheppard Mullin
 A married couple have a community property estate worth $12 million, and they have used up none of their estate tax exemptions through lifetime gifts. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:45 am by Sheppard Mullin
 A married couple have a community property estate worth $12 million, and they have used up none of their estate tax exemptions through lifetime gifts. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 8:43 am by Eric
However, the DPL has some obvious limitations (among others): (1) it does not affect patent trolls who never participate in the DPL, (2) it assumes enough players join the DPL to make other companies want to join the network (i.e., the DPL exhibits network effects), and (3) it assumes that DPL participants bring enforcement actions against non-DPL participants; otherwise, the non-participants can free-ride off the network without paying the costs. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
As Emmett Macfarlane has argued, [1] Harper’s skepticism pierced a bipartisan “Charter regime” that had existed from 1982 until 2006. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 12:00 am
  Maximum jail time of 6 months   Approximately $3500 in fines   12 months with the ignition interlock   One year revocation of license (may be eligible for a restricted license to and from work/school with interlock, alcohols screening and SR22). [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  However, the Court’s approach says more about the Supreme Court’s cultural objectives than it does about the original meaning of the First Amendment. [read post]
28 May 2011, 6:25 am by Josh Sturtevant
  This does not cast the renewable industry in a great light and it is nearly impossible to craft this into a coherent marketing pitch to consumers. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 7:40 am by Transplanted Lawyer
The presence of American military troops in Iraq and Afghanistan is the #1 recruitment tool we have handed the bad guys, and misconduct by U.S. military personnel is the #2 tool. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:20 am by eburleson
Many of us have not slept more than 1-3 hours a night since we arrived in Durban. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 10:06 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Likewise, the content is not tailored to any particular situation and does not necessarily address all relevant issues. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
But that does not mean that the Court is required to ignore the government's concerns regarding ongoing criminal and national security investigations. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:13 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
The requirement in INA § 286(m) that “adjudication fees” be designated “in regulations” by the Attorney General (now USCIS, since the passage of the Homeland Security Act) is satisfied by regulations found at 8 CFR § 103.7 (b)(1)(i)(C)(Biometric Fee of $85), , 8 CFR § 103.7 (b)(1)(M)(3)(Application for Advance Parole [international travel permission] fee of $360), 8 CFR § 103.7 (b)(1)(HH)(Application for an Employment… [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm by David Kopel
So it would be contrary to circuit precedent to assert that the Second Amendment does not protect the sale of firearms. [read post]