Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 8921 - 8940
of 120,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2020, 7:42 am
The Tyler v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 11:10 am
Georgia State University Logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)In what may be a precedent-setting 350-page ruling in Cambridge University Press et al. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:18 pm
If, as Defendant argues, components assembled for a pre-determined use may never constitute substantial transformation, then, for all practical purposes, there can never be a substantial transformation because there will always be a pre-determined use. . . . [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 9:35 pm
Instead of focusing on the use of a name when obtaining the discounted fares, the Sixth Circuit distinguished prior cases (U.S. v .Miller and U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 3:05 pm
” To be sure, a state statute does provide, “Any person whose name, portrait, or picture is used within the state or advertising purposes or for the purposes of trade without his or her written consent may bring an action in the superior court against the person so using his or her name, portrait, or picture to prevent and restrain the use thereof, and may recover damages for any injuries sustained by reason of such use. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 1:01 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm
This was confirmed in the case of Douglas & ors v Hello! [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:55 am
Parish v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 6:20 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:48 am
” Winans v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:32 am
On 2 December 2019, the Supreme Court heard the case of R v Hilton following certification by the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:30 am
Alderman v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:06 pm
Private deed restrictions, for example, are agreements that stipulate how a property may or may not be used and that allow individual property owners to dictate everything from land use to architectural design. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:33 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:54 am
The case was Hicks v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 2:49 am
Per U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:57 am
* Crass and Offensive Tweets by Student May not Justify Suspension — Rosario v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:33 pm
You may recognize Xyngular as the company for which serial scammer Jennifer McKinney shills. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
Similarly, nuisance is a flexible and versatile tort which may protect novel amenities like privacy without much difficulty. [read post]
