Search for: "SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL"
Results 8921 - 8940
of 29,228
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2018, 3:38 am
District Judge Nicholas D. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
For the above reasons, the court affirmed the district court's judgment denying attorneys’ fees and dismissed the rest of the appeal as moot. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 12:34 pm
Florida’s First District Court of Appeal recently considered one of those exceptions in a child pornography case. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 10:56 am
The district court dismissed the civil suit, saying that there was no constitutional violation “because the incriminating statements were never used at trial. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 6:43 am
Second District Court of Appeals Judge Michael T. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 8:28 am
The state’s Second District Court of Appeal recently explained how the rule works in a drug case out of Polk County. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:35 am
The Sixth District Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court, holding that the licensing provisions at issue violated the Ohio Constitution’s single-subject provision, were an unlawful delegation of the state’s licensing authority, and constituted an undue burden on a woman’s right to obtain an abortion. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:04 am
But the Court of Appeals (Newman and Lohier, with Jacobs in dissent) says the channel is a state actor for First Amendment purposes, and therefore may be sued.The majority parses a lengthy Supreme Court ruling, Denver Areas Educ. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
In 2011 two district court judges found that the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate was unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:05 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s judgment and instruct that court to remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss all claims for prospective relief regarding pregnant unaccompanied minors. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 7:25 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed down a decision in Linde v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 6:36 am
The California Court of Appeal for the Second District recently held that a correction offer under the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act did not prevent a consumer from pursuing causes of action for fraud and violation of the California Unfair Competition Law based on the same conduct because the CLRA’s remedies are cumulative and non-exhaustive. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal and held that an action by the Orange County District Attorney for civil penalties under the UCL was not preempted by Fed/OSHA (the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (29 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal and held that an action by the Orange County District Attorney for civil penalties under the UCL was not preempted by Fed/OSHA (the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (29 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 2:48 pm
BC498002, Feb. 2, 2018), the Second District Court of Appeal ruled that a solar power purchase agreement (“PPA”) provider that only sells … [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 9:19 am
The article, which is titled “Statute of Limitation Begins to Run When Principal Under Surety Bond Abandons Construction Project,” focuses on a recent ruling by the Second District Court of Appeal finding that the limitations period for action on a surety bond began to run when the principal under the bond abandoned a construction project. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 9:19 am
The article, which is titled “Statute of Limitation Begins to Run When Principal Under Surety Bond Abandons Construction Project,” focuses on a recent ruling by the Second District Court of Appeal finding that the limitations period for action on a surety bond began to run when the principal under the bond abandoned a construction project. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 6:41 am
"The district court got it wrong, the Court of Appeals (Katzmann, Walker and Calabresi) says, because it did not address an important precedent, Glatt v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:55 am
In a separate recently decided PTA case, a district court has agreed with Ariad that its original RCE filing should only cut-off PTA accumulation since the PTO negligently failed to process the filing (instead sending a notice of abandonment) and then took three months to withdraw the abandonment. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:17 am
District Court, as permitted by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
