Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 8921 - 8940
of 13,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2011, 2:32 pm
See Reitz v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 9:04 pm
Portillo, R. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 11:19 am
Reversing a ruling by Support Magistrate Rachelle C. [read post]
16 May 2017, 5:47 am
Jessica C. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:53 pm
Sanchez, and C. [read post]
18 May 2012, 4:49 am
See also United States v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
It was accepted that the decorations were in a poor, rather tatty state, although dreadful. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:21 am
General Traditional knowledge and genetic resources – developing IPRs – 19 developing nations meet in Bali (IP Komodo Dragon) Twelve more nations, EU, sign Nagoya Protocol (IP Watch) Australia: Update on Australian Senate gene patent inquiry (Patentology) Canada: Amending Canada’s Access to Medicines Regime (CAMR): The new fate of Bill C-393 (IP Watch) EU: Negative term SPC – A handy note on Case C-125/10 Merck (The SPC Blog) (EPLAW) Italy: Milan… [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm
SOCAN and Rogers, et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am
Give and take between marketing and R&D/nutrition. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:47 am
State, 2 Tex. 481 (1847); see also Freeland v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am
Mr L argued firstly that the judge below had failed to apply the test in Kennealy v Dunne [1977] 1 QBD 837 properly.The court is required to be satisfied that the premises are reasonably required, but on the authority of Kennealy v Dunne that reasonable requirement must be something more than a desire but less than a necessity. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am
Mr L argued firstly that the judge below had failed to apply the test in Kennealy v Dunne [1977] 1 QBD 837 properly.The court is required to be satisfied that the premises are reasonably required, but on the authority of Kennealy v Dunne that reasonable requirement must be something more than a desire but less than a necessity. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:04 am
I don’t have a clear vision of which group will prevail or how the SESTA v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:04 am
I don’t have a clear vision of which group will prevail or how the SESTA v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:54 am
§ 504(c)(2); see, e.g., Yurman Design, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:49 am
Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2012 SCC 35 and the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in ITV Broadcasting Ltd and other companies v TVCatchup Ltd, [2013] 3 C.M.L.R. 1 (Case C-607-11, CJEU). [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:02 am
Other states are still a work in progress, though they have been moving toward embracing international standards: e.g., Paraguay. [read post]
