Search for: "State v. Dollar"
Results 8921 - 8940
of 9,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2022, 1:52 pm
” In Facebook v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 11:00 am
This was demonstrated in Descôteaux v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 8:59 am
Another tool for policyholders in state court (but not federal) is the Offer of Judgment rule, R. 4:58. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:03 am
Dee V Benson, US Dist. [read post]
5 May 2015, 5:22 am
State, Ms. [read post]
2 Feb 2019, 4:09 am
’” Braley, 832 F.2d at 1512 (quoting McCandless v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:21 am
(SEC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 8:10 am
In the 2013 decision Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:57 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 11:22 am
The Manual states that:a written authorization respecting failure to give notice of resignation would be invalid if the amount to be deducted constituted a penalty rather than a genuine attempt to pre-estimate damages.As such, while an employer is precluded from an imposing a penalty on a departing employee, the Manual leaves open the possibility that an employer could institute a contractual mechanism to dock wages provided it was based upon a genuine (and demonstrable)… [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 4:45 am
The name of the case is Hope Ranch Park Association v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Independent Contractor Hired on Fixed Term Renewable Contract In Elder v Max Wright Real Estate, Mr. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:21 pm
- Bryant left Mattel to become a consultant for MGA, and MGA turned the Bratz dolls into a billion dollar success. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
A foreign private adviser is any investment adviser who (1) has no place of business in the United States; (2) has fewer than 15 clients and investors in the United States in private funds advised by the adviser; (3) has aggregate assets under management attributable to clients in the United States and investors in the United States in private funds advised by the investment adviser of less than $25 million; and (4) does not hold itself out generally to the U.S.… [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 10:28 am
The Court, in deciding this case, is not likely to reopen its 1872 precedent in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:41 am
Smith In the six years since the landmark Kelo v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:00 pm
At the federal level, United States trademark law is governed by the Trademark Act of 1946, or the Lanham Act, which provides for, among other [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:57 pm
(See Simmons v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
The lack of regulatory oversight has largely been the reason behind the success virtually unknown companies have had in raising millions – sometimes hundreds of millions – of dollars through ICOs. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
