Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 8921 - 8940
of 11,378
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2018, 8:12 pm
” Although some out-of-state insurers won a few victories in the federal courts (sitting in diversity jurisdiction), California state courts overwhelmingly sided with policyholders. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:56 am
It has been my understanding that the California Rules Revision Commission was supposed to harmonize California law with the Model Rules so far as the bar would tolerate such harmonization (i.e., preserving California's strong confidentiality rules and a couple of others). [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
After the case was filed in 2001, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California certified the class in 2004. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 11:38 am
In California, the ratio is even more striking, at an egregious 20 to 1. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Consequently, any inability by Finelite to state a claim for restitution does not constitute a bar to Finelite's seeking injunctive relief. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 9:48 am
Since pre-1972 sound recordings are not covered under federal copyright law, they are instead protected under state misappropriation law. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:24 am
The Ninth also ended Dougherty’s claim against the City of Covina, saying he had never stated his claim adequately. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 1:52 am
United States, 364 U.S. 40 (1960). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of DRI – The Voice of the Defense Bar Amicus brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 7:51 am
One such occasion came a little over a year ago, when the justices refused to weigh in on a California law that, as a general rule, bars people from carrying guns in public. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 10:33 pm
It means the California’s largest oyster farm is facing imminent closure, bringing the loss of 40 percent of state’s safe supply of oysters. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm
Addressing the merits of the Title VII claim, the district court determined that his claim was controlled by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Johnson v Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County, California (480 U.S. 616 (1987)), and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v Weber (20 EPD ¶30,026 (1979). [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:20 pm
Some states also require that you give them a chance to "cure" (make it right) the breach before you can file a claim in court too. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:04 am
California, 403 U.S. 15, 24 (1971). [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:12 am
Doing so became critical after the Supreme Court in Cyan held that plaintiffs may assert Securities Act claims in state court, which resulted in an influx of state court securities suits, often parallel to and duplicative of federal court lawsuits. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:38 pm
In contrast to the Tree Top Court’s unwillingness to infer an implied demand, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, in Scottsdale Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 12:47 pm
The court concluded that the policy’s Forum Selection Clause requiring any suit be in New York controlled and barred Landec from litigating in California. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:57 pm
Reeves was hoping a California Supreme Court decision this month, which upheld parts of Jessica's Law, would clarify whether the law could be criminally enforced. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:46 pm
There is a case pending under California state law, but so far nothing really appears to have come out of all those allegations, and they won't even be part of the big San Diego case. [read post]
10 May 2016, 12:49 pm
CV 13-03826-EMC, a suit brought by California drivers, and Yucesoy v. [read post]
