Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 8921 - 8940
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2006, 1:11 am
National Adoption Day, celebrated every year on the Saturday before Thanksgiving, is a day when thousands of children across the United States are formally adopted by families. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 3:59 pm
Respondents also counter the standards proposed by petitioner and the United States. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 1:45 pm
Shanmugam, who will argue on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae in support of petitioner. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 4:46 am
" Additionally, Goodyear points out that the limitations period was not at issue in Bazemore because claims brought by the United States were not subject to section 706(e). [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 2:43 pm
The United States, as amicus on behalf of petitioners, makes similar arguments. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
The Employer and Petitioner are parties to a collective-bargaining agreement that covers a unit of service and maintenance employees, including the CNAs. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 4:40 am
The history of the regulation of same-sex desire in the United States is one of overlapping and mutually reinforcing prohibitions. [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 6:29 am
That judge read recent Supreme Court precedents differently, saying "the one constant in all these cases is that the petitioners were in the custody of the United States alone, in its capacity as the United States, and not by any multinational force. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 2:29 pm
United States and Shepard v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 6:45 am
Blatt, arguing on behalf of the United States, took the position that the case before the Court was not moot because the second bankruptcy case was still on appeal to the U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 9:06 am
United States, No. 05-3034 (November 3, 2006): Mr. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 8:46 am
"[6] Because "[t]he legality of petitioner's detention depends on the resolution of such issues as whether the government lawfully revoked his visa and whether he is removable from the United States," and Congress stripped courts of many of their abilities, Judge Adelman concluded that she did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the matter, and thus "cannot address [Mr. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 9:27 am
Spock, No. 74-848, Brief for Petitioners, 1975 WL 173767. [read post]
29 Oct 2006, 12:09 pm
[It claimed to be "the number-one rated Hispanic company in the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2006, 7:24 am
State Department, 22,728 visas were issued to orphans entering the United States. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 6:24 am
[Congress] has not foreclosed their right to contend that the Constitution or laws of the United States withhold authority to proceed with the trial. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
He wrote that the Petitioner has satisfied all three prongs of the rebuttal test and has shown by compelling evidence that a less than systemwide unit is appropriate in this case. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 9:44 pm
In addition, the test is well settled, and messing with the test would have a far-reaching and complex impact on the economy and state of innovation. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Oct 2006, 7:39 am
United States, 298 F.3d 34, 43 (1st Cir. 2002), it concludes that once he is found guilty, the judge can do the rest. [read post]
