Search for: "U.S. Judiciary" Results 8921 - 8940 of 11,664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2010, 6:52 am by Adam Chandler
One is that the Senate Judiciary Committee delayed its vote on the nomination until next Tuesday, as reported by the Boston Globe, the San Francisco Chronicle, the Christian Science Monitor, and SCOTUSblog. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:23 am
The Senate Judiciary Committee has postponed consideration of Elena Kagan's nomination to the U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:35 am by Matthew Scarola
Although the Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote in favor of Elena Kagan’s nomination, it is not expected to do so today. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:48 pm by Lyle Denniston
  This is inimical to an ndependent judiciary, which, under our tripartite system, may not constitutionally cede remedy in a case or controversy to the political branches. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:23 pm
“I am pretty sure that this (new law) will divert attention and money from policing the monsters (and God knows there are plenty of monsters out there),” wrote U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 12:01 pm
I have never used these terms for any purpose.That's the written response of Solicitor General Elena Kagan (above left) to the query below by U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:09 am by James Bickford
Hurley argues that “[o]ne of the most distinctive features of the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:26 am by Randy Barnett
[no commandeering of state legislatures] & Printz v U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by @ErikJHeels
It Don't Mean A Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 4:55 pm by John Phillips
Tilley, 490 U.S. 714, Justice Marshall delivered a fairly unremarkable opinion in an Employee Retirement Income Security Act case. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 4:35 pm
"Said to be raging just days before the Judiciary Committee's scheduled vote on the nomination of Solicitor General Elena Kagan (left) to the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm by Itai Maytal
” Likewise, footage of plaintiffs’ counsel interacting with the Ecuadorian judiciary and government officials could show that the Chevron parties were denied due process in the civil and criminal matters in Ecuador. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm by Itai Maytal
Likewise, footage of plaintiffs’ counsel interacting with the Ecuadorian judiciary and government officials could show that the Chevron parties were denied due process in the civil and criminal matters in Ecuador. [read post]