Search for: "United States v. Was"
Results 8921 - 8940
of 102,813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2018, 4:10 pm
Department of Housing and Urban Development 17-1353 Issue: Whether an action for the restoration of grant-in-aid funds illegally recouped by the United States constitutes a suit for specific relief such that the United States’ sovereign immunity is waived pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. [read post]
SCOTUS Dubs PTAB/APJ Structure a ‘Rare Bird’, Pushes for Workable Remedies in Arthrex Oral Arguments
1 Mar 2021, 12:17 pm
Supreme Court today heard arguments in United States/ Smith & Nephew v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 1:28 pm
Here is the abstract: This Article presents newly discovered archival evidence demonstrating that government lawyers told a crucial lie to the United States Supreme Court in the case of Hirabayashi v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:27 pm
United States, Case No. 22-49 (June 16, 2023), the United States Supreme Court resolved a circuit split and held that 18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:07 pm
On July 14, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, with Judge Lourie writing for the majority, affirmed-in-part and vacated-in-part a decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Packet Intelligence, LLC v. [read post]
Breaking News: The SG has asked for an extension of time in which to file a cert petition in Prather
16 Jun 2011, 8:09 am
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 5:13 am
Securities Industry Commentator: A legal, regulatory, and compliance feed curated by veteran Wall Street lawyer Bill Singer http://www.rrbdlaw.com/3958/securities-industry-commentator/ In today’s Securities Industry Commentator feed: United States of America, Appellee, v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:41 pm
United States, has been greeted with disappointment, puzzlement, and even anger. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:52 am
In CW Government Travel, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 12:49 pm
In Ex parte Hiroyuki Itagaki the PTAB has ruled a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machine to be patent ineligible because it is an abstract idea, citing the United States Supreme Court's decision in Alice v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm
Today, in Carpenter v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:04 am
In his majority opinion for the United States Supreme Court that upheld President Trump’s limitations on travel to the United States in the case of Hawaii v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm
On July 22, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the Board) in Uniloc 2017, LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
This case is Georgia v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:24 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al., v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 1:15 pm
On October 27, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) in Corcamore, LLC v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:26 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 7:29 am
See Ghazali v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:51 am
In CW Government Travel, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 2:46 am
United States, 786 F.3d 1039 (2015). [read post]
