Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 8941 - 8960
of 8,961
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2006, 3:42 am
Being held at gunpoint, defendant was in custody for Miranda purposes. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 2:50 am
Alverez, 2006 UT 61, 2006 Utah LEXIS 196 (October 20, 2006) [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 10:16 pm
You jailed her for 15 to 20 days.14. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 6:24 am
Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co., 20 Cal.4th 163 (Cal. 1999). [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 9:19 pm
Take a look at Volume 1, Edition 1 (see the Comments below for Karl's warning). [read post]
13 Sep 2006, 12:26 pm
(Gentry was an habitual offender case as well--Gentry got an extra 20 years for the HO enhancement of his now-suspect burglary conviction.) [read post]
12 Sep 2006, 11:28 am
Thus at that stage the district court is free to consider what the sentence would be under a ratio (such as 20:1) that more accurately reflects the seriousness of crack in relation to powder. [read post]
8 Sep 2006, 5:40 am
A few highlights:1. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 5:26 am
This is RODEO/RODEO DRIVE, a decision of the Higher District Court Duesseldorf, Case I-20 U 110/04 of 8 November 2005 (available only from the OHIM website). [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 4:12 pm
I didn't say that: 1. [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 6:00 pm
That the doctor does not devote annually more than twenty percent (20%) of his professional activities to activities that directly involve testimony in personal injury claims. [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 6:00 pm
That the doctor does not devote annually more than twenty percent (20%) of his professional activities to activities that directly involve testimony in personal injury claims. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 8:40 am
As a resource for class action defense attorneys who defend against actions under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., we provide the text of the FCRA. [read post]
22 Jul 2006, 4:50 pm
This rule does not apply if a trial court merely substitutes a court-appointed attorney to represent a defendant at a particular hearing, the defendant agrees to the substitution, and the original attorney does not object. [read post]
22 Feb 2006, 3:56 am
This issue became more important for manufacture offenses occurring after May 20, 2004, the effective date of the legislative McAdam fix (which purports to return all manufacture related offenses to drug severity level 1).In October, the COA held that the two statutes do not proscribe identical conduct in State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2005, 2:50 am
Andersen further alleged:20. [read post]
18 Sep 2005, 7:10 pm
Texas Public Defender, host of Injustice Anywhere, is none too happy that a 73-year-old woman was arrested for looting in New Orleans and faced a $50,000 bond. [read post]
4 Dec 2004, 9:47 am
October 20, 2004) (" [I]t appears our trial courts no longer have discretion to sentence a criminal defendant to more than the presumptive sentence unless the defendant waives his right to a jury at sentencing, a jury first determines the existence of aggravating factors, or the defendant has a criminal history. [read post]
9 Oct 2004, 3:46 pm
§ 841(b)(1)(A). [read post]
31 Dec 2000, 4:00 pm
As such, it is not difficult to see why the State takes the position it does in these prosecutions. [read post]
