Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 8941 - 8960 of 41,681
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 4:23 am by Matthew Lerner
  The Court noted that the key to sec. 240(1) liability was shielding the injured worker from harm directly flowing from the application of the force of gravity to an object or person.The Court held that the relevant inquiry in a falling object case is whether the harm flows directly from the application of the force of gravity to the object; it does not depend upon whether the object has hit the worker.What about the elevation level being de minimis? [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 7:48 am by Dan Carvajal
On January 1, the surtax dropped to 10 percent, bringing the top marginal rate to 8.25 percent. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 2:59 am
 So, Del Monte Fresh does not have the facts on its side but what about the law? [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 2:05 pm by Bill Marler
Georgia (2), Illinois (1), Massachusetts (2), Maryland (6), Minnesota (1), Missouri (2), North Carolina (1), New Jersey (2), New York (7), Pennsylvania (1), Virginia (2) and Wisconsin (1). [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 1:28 pm by Bill Marler
Georgia (2), Illinois (1), Massachusetts (2), Maryland (6), Minnesota (1), Missouri (2), North Carolina (1), New Jersey (2), New York (7), Pennsylvania (1), Virginia (2) and Wisconsin (1). [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Directive does not require proof of pecuniary damage, but it was held in Johnson –v- Medical Defence Union that the DPA does.) [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm by Sheppard Mullin
On the other hand, if it does so hold, the entire landscape of antitrust consumer class actions could drastically change. 1. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 2:43 pm by Quinta Jurecic
On April 10, 2018, I issued Proclamation 9723 (Maintaining Enhanced Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats), removing travel restrictions on nationals of the Republic of Chad. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Inter alia, the feature in granted claim 1 relating to the separation of the aldehyde from the reaction solution “by distillation at a temperature of at most 150ºC under a pressure of 1.33 x 10**(2) to 1.004 x 10**(5) Pa (1 to 755 mmHg)” was objected to for having no basis in the application as filed.[2.2] In order to determine whether or not the subject-matter of a claim in a patent extends beyond the content of the application as filed it has to… [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 7:10 am by Bob Kraft
The original 10% withholding only applies now to sales where the amount realized is $1 million or less and the buyer signs an affidavit that the intention is to use the home as a personal residence. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 8:21 pm
Lets take a look at some of the Facebook groups involved. 1. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Unlike Item 101(c)(1)(vii) of Regulation S-K, Item 101(h)(4)(vi) does not require a smaller reporting company to identify the name of any customer that accounts for 10% or more of its revenue. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:27 am
Lets take a look at some of the Facebook groups involved. 1. [read post]