Search for: "High v State"
Results 8941 - 8960
of 35,522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2011, 7:53 am
Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Last month, Judge Green of the Los Angeles County Superior Court in Crest v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
State Atty’s office. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:12 am
The Court next week will hear oral arguments in what may be the highest-stakes (at least in terms of dollars potentially at stake) case of the Term, Universal Health Services v United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:14 am
Fortunately, we also learned last year, that the High Court – in the injunctive relief proceedings - ruled that the public interest (the conduct of free and fair elections in 2011) overweighed intellectual property rights – damages being appropriate remedy. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:20 am
First, back in 2008, in the UK High Court case of Hays v Ions, Mark Ions, a former employee of recruitment company Hays, was ordered to hand over details of contacts that he had migrated from his work email address book to his personal LinkedIn account. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:33 am
However this approach is not based on some high principle. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 9:05 pm
On September 28, in the case of Hoffer v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 6:01 am
In both states, the law is clear that penalty provisions in contracts are not enforceable. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:05 pm
Sheriff v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:05 pm
[Ira Stoll, more] “Returning to Common-Law Principles of Insider Trading After United States v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 6:55 am
Brownstein, Sabastian V. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:21 am
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
In a 2007 dissent in James v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 9:52 am
36 years ago today, the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 12:54 pm
Recall the April 9th Indiana Court of Appeals decision in A.B. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:20 pm
Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:32 pm
In Haaland v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
” Even the arbitrators’ finding that the fee agreement was not falsified or a fraudulent copy was not reviewable.In Hawaii State Teachers Assoc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 10:21 am
See Danforth v. [read post]
