Search for: "House v. State" Results 8941 - 8960 of 25,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2011, 5:32 am by Rosalind English
 The House of Lords  held, similarly, that Article 6 (1) and (2) guaranteed fair procedure and the presumption of innocence but did not place any obligation on States as regards the substantive contents of domestic law, including the mental or other elements of offences under domestic criminal law. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 10:01 pm
Today marks the 34th anniversary of the decision in Roe v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am by Adam Baker
Its employees were members of an “in-house” union, and were not affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (“IBEW”). [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:57 am by Michael Lowe
  HR 184 has got a long road to travel:  first, HR 184 must get the approval of the House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee to proceed to consideration via a full House vote. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:53 pm by David Smith
Johnson & Ors v Old [2013] EWCA Civ 415The Court of Appeal has been turning its mind to another of the odd questions that has sprung from the fertile litigious bosom of tenancy deposit protection. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in  Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:28 am by Russ Bensing
In Columbus, the only opinion of note was State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 3:40 am by Eleonora Rosati
 The architect claimed in fact that both modifications made to his social housing project ‘Casa Bosco’ and the transformation of the project into a for-profit enterprise indeed infringed his moral right of integrity.The decisionThe Court began its analysis by noting that Article 20(2) of the Act also states that [the translation from Italian is mine] “in works of architecture the author cannot object to any modifications that were necessary in the course of… [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
According to the Illinois Republican, there had been a conspiracy among four “workmen” of the Democratic Party to nationalize slavery in the United States, which had culminated in Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:49 am by Gritsforbreakfast
She wants the money that criminal defendants pay in court costs to directly benefit the court system.The First Court panel deciding Peraza v. [read post]