Search for: "JOHN DOES 1 -10"
Results 8941 - 8960
of 9,146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2007, 5:03 pm
To register for the course, please contact Michele Bridges, associate director of the Center for Intellectual Property, at The John Marshall Law School, at +1-312-427-2737 or 6bridges@inta.org". [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 12:27 am
Consequently, the court certified two questions to the New York Court of Appeals: (1) Does New York Recognize the Famous Marks Doctrine? [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 7:35 pm
Doe, 538 U.S. 1 (2003), a Connecticut statute provided for public disclosure of the state's sex offender registry.Even in the wake of Doe, there are two arguable reasons for why sex offenders are being denied due process rights when banned from social online communities without any determination of their current dangerousness. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:32 pm
Therefore, the Board concluded that laches does not apply.Inevitable Confusion: For the sake of completeness, the Board considered the doctrine of inevitable confusion. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
But the two Justices who filed a separate "statement," John Paul Stevens and Anthony M. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 4:00 am
" But does the same principle apply in court? [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 4:00 am
" But does the same principle apply in court? [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 11:34 pm
Death penalty becomes a life sentence of appeals By John Hilton, April 1, 2007 Last updated: Sunday, April 1, 2007 12:40 AM EDTFour people saw Seifullah Abdul-Salaam shoot New Cumberland police officer Willis Cole in broad daylight Aug. 19, 1994, on a borough street. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 7:46 am
Most does not. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 2:12 am
The Becket Fund letter, dated March 23, strongly criticizes CAIR for including as defendants several "John Does", some of whom are apparently senior citizens who contacted U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:01 am
How does Christian eschatology differ from Jewish eschatology? [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:11 am
The Society of Settlement Planners, Inc. apparently does not want you to know this information. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:56 am
That led to a 2-1 U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
"The Board therefore affirmed the Section 2(e)(2) refusal.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 2:10 pm
John -- are you screaming yet? [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:43 am
According to Internet Archive, it does not pop up as a separate screen that a user must "clickthrough" in order to access web material and does not require users to agree to these terms before accessing material. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:55 pm
This is amisdemeanor, punishable by up to a year's imprisonment or a fine of $2,500, or both. 720 ILCS 5/12-5(b); 730 ILCS 5/5-8-3(a)(1), 5/5-9-1(a)(2). [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:41 pm
January 2007 White Paper from Osterman Research authored by John A. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 11:01 am
They claimed that they misunderstood the requirements of Section 1(a), and particularly the legal meaning of "use in commerce," and that they "honestly believed that their ownership of the same mark in Australia and their use in commerce of such mark in Australia justified their Section 1(a) filing in the U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 1:35 am
This is the #1 problem with relying on volunteers. [read post]
