Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 8941 - 8960 of 71,764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm by Jeffrey Mitchell
Federal Courts: Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 11:45 am by FM Librarian
If you are not familiar with Open Access, please visit my other blog for an introduction.Green Open Access [info]"The Ambiguous Authority of a ‘Surrogate State’: UNHCR’s Negotiation of Asylum in the Complexities of Migration in Southeast Asia," Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales (Forthcoming, 2019) - The postprint version of this article is currently under embargo. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am by Stephen Sachs
 The article takes on about a century's worth of legal prejudices, nowadays associated with the Supreme Court's decision in Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
  The second case was ViiV Healthcare v Minister of Health, where a judicial review was filed earlier this year. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:49 am by Joy Waltemath
Applying the states three-factor analysis, the court found that ADP’s agreements will pass muster once the district court, on remand, strikes any offending provisions (Rafferty v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that  test. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
This is particularly evident in the White Paper’s discussion of Disinformation. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 2:17 pm by FM Librarian
, Washington, DC, 16 April 2019 [info]- Follow link for video.This Immigration Judge Has a Fix for Immigration Courts (Slate's What Next, April 2019) [info]- Follow link for podcast.Related post:- Regional Focus: United States - Pt. 1 (29 April 2019)Tagged Publications. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:36 am by FHH Law
Filers that submit Form 395 can satisfy this requirement by completing Section V of Form 395 and need not submit a separate report. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:10 am by Joy Waltemath
Vacating a district court’s dismissal of an employee’s ADEA suit based on a lack of prosecution—there had been no action for three years until the death of a key witness prompted an employer’s motion to dismiss—the Third Circuit found the lower court misstated the law, relied upon findings that were not supported by the record, and did not consider the employer’s motion in light of the circuit’s strong policy of… [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:03 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Next fall, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in County of Maui v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The complaint further alleges that the defendant’s negligence proximately caused the plaintiffs to sustain actual and ascertainable damages in lost rent and in settling the action brought by the Hive, and thus, validly states a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 443; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 847; Wolstencroft v Sassower, 124… [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” At Sands Anderson, Cullen Seltzer discusses last week’s decision in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]