Search for: "Stevens v. Stevens"
Results 8941 - 8960
of 10,144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2012, 10:40 am
In its 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 1:23 pm
In the case of Blake v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:48 pm
(Indeed, Justice Scalia apparently thought that Justice Stevens’s majority opinion in Raich was too broad, so he concurred only with the result. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 3:27 am
What this refers to is the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Brooks v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
Along with Michael Ratner and Steven Watt at the Center for Constitutional Rights, Clive was my co-counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:16 am
Fischer (2005, 2011) Thinking Like a Writer: A Lawyer’s Guide to Writing and Editing, by Steven V. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:00 am
"Harris v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 5:46 am
Ct. at 2717 (quoting Babbitt v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 8:34 am
., v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 8:55 am
In C.W. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
The companies argue that the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA) does not authorize the NMFS, which resides within the U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 6:01 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:10 am
He was often disappointed in his colleagues, most especially for their decision in Bush v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:31 am
Padilla v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 5:02 pm
-Steven Silverberg [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 3:47 am
If oral argument in Friedrichs v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 6:28 am
" Haskell v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room After Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 4:05 am
Steven Millan. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
Church of England: blessing for same-sex couples General Synod has agreed that a trial of stand-alone services of blessing for same-sex couples may go ahead, after an amendment to the main motion on the issue tabled by the Bishop of Oxford, Steven Croft, to bring forward the standalone services was agreed by a narrow majority. [read post]
