Search for: "United States v. California" Results 8941 - 8960 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2008, 11:03 am
United States (2003) 539 U.S. 166, finding them equally applicable here: Courts, however, must consider the facts of the individual case in evaluating the Government's interest . . . . [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am by John Ehrett
California Teachers Association 14-915Issue: (1) Whether Abood v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
New Hampshire has the highest level of net outbound smuggling at 52.4 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, agreed that the unconscionably finding under California law was preempted by the FAA. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
  For comparison purposes, see Church of Scientology of California v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:52 pm
American Standard, Inc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 56, and Saul Alinksy's brief discussion of the recent California decision in Taylor v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:09 am
” Moreover, Section 22(a) specifically provides that no case “brought in any state court of competent jurisdiction shall be removed to any court of the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm by John Elwood
United States, 20-1410, and Kahn v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:30 am by Robin Mashal
Mashal has been admitted to the State Bar of California and the Bar of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:29 am by Kenneth Odza
The Bad: Coincidently, in another case involving a putative consumer fraud class claim over depictions of fruits on a label, Judge Gorton of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Wiley v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:56 am by WSLL
Issues: Whether Appellant was denied his right to present a defense to the jury guaranteed by Art. 1, § 10 of the Wyoming Constitution and the United States Constitution. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger takes a lighter look at Missud v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:15 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Entertainment Merchants Ass’n (challenging, on First Amendment grounds, a California state ban on the sale of violent video games to minors) and Snyder v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 2:27 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
A third notable cert denial came in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
The approach outlined here does not undermine Skoien, 614 F.3d at 639-43, or United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm by Scott Bomboy
The question for the justices is about “the proper test for determining whether wetlands are ‘waters of the United States’ under the Clean Water Act. [read post]