Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 8941 - 8960
of 10,395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2010, 1:17 pm
Wyeth v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:33 pm
United States, 239 U.S. 510, 517–18 (1916)). [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 8:03 am
" Bennett v.. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:57 am
The Federal Circuit reversed and held that fraud could only be proven through clear and convincing evidence of an intent to deceive the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), and reinstated Bose’s registration. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 2:36 am
In this later proceeding, the Panel apparently ignorant of the earlier proceeding, in essence fell back on constructive knowledge: “Respondent either knew, or should have known, of Complainant’s SAVE THE CHILDREN mark when it registered the Domain Name insofar as, well before Respondent registered the Domain Name, the Mark had been in use (since 1939), the Mark was well-known in the United States and abroad. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP) United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 12:00 am
Now, over three years later, the United States Court of Appeals has affirmed Mr. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 9:45 am
United National Ins. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 4:46 am
Creative Arts by Calloway, LLC has filed a complaint (here) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeking review under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 2:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General November and December 2009 – quick links of all the top stories (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Patents If nothing else, patent attorneys will follow the semantics – machine-or-transformation standard and claim terms (ISinIP) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Nokia - Nokia hurls new salvo in spat with Apple, complains to ITC (Ars Technica) (ITC) US… [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:24 pm
The case of State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:24 pm
The case of State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 5:45 am
V. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm
HOSPITAL SETTLE FRAUD CASE FOR $3 MILLION, United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 9:41 am
., v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 6:46 pm
United States, 239 U.S. 510, 517-18 (1916)). [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 10:09 am
Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
(IP Watch) Canada EU demands for trade deal would reshape Canadian IP law (Michael Geist) Federal Court considers colour marks: Peak Innovations Inc v Simpson Strong Tie Company (Canadian Trademark Blog) China China’s standards and patent innovation proposals: problems for IPR and global trade? [read post]
