Search for: "D. J." Results 8961 - 8980 of 23,061
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2016, 7:59 am by Nancy E. Halpern, DVM, Esq.
A food employee may refill a beverage glass in the outdoor dining area from a pitcher or other container; (d) food and water provided to companion dogs shall only be in single-use disposable containers; (e) food employees are prohibited from having direct contact with companion dogs while on duty. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 4:28 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The drama may be a bit of foreshadowing for Mascherano’s teammate (and recent Ballon d’Or winner) Lionel Messi. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
 Just posted on the website of the DC Circuit Historical Society is the oral history of Bruce J. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:35 pm by Kent Scheidegger
(j) The victim of the capital felony was a law enforcement officer engaged in the performance of his or her official duties. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:55 pm by Michele Berger
Articles of incorporation typically identify: (a) The organization’s name; (b) Purpose or purposes of the nonprofit; (c) Agent for service of process — that is, a person whose name and address are identified and who can receive lawsuits and other official correspondence and other matters; and (d) Any limitations on corporate powers. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:01 am by José Guillermo
En aquella ocasión me molestó muchísimo que los jóvenes, especialmente mujeres (8 de cada 10 hasta el día de hoy, que bajan por donde dice subir, son mujeres) descendieran del Bus por donde dice subir, le recriminé al chófer, pero con el no era, así que tome una decisión drástica y dije, bueno "por esta puerta (la de subida) bajan los decrépitos y los peruanos", para mi sorpresa desde ese… [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 11:38 am by Patrick J. Murphy, Esq.
If you are charged in Massachusetts with a drug crime, contact the Law Office of Patrick J. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 6:28 am by scanner1
RICHARD CONVERSE d/b/a DC TAX SERVICE, INC., Respondents and Appellants. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:21 am by Thomas D. Nevins
  Dismissal of plaintiffs’ Section 2(d) and 2(f) claims was affirmed due to the court’s holding that plaintiffs had not suffered any antitrust injury. [read post]