Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 8961 - 8980 of 16,596
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2013, 8:47 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
 While the posting obligation imposes no penalty on corporate customers under DOL H-1B regulations, the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) does, as confirmed in this DOL presentation, “The Employment of Non-Immigrants on H-1B Visas” (slides 42-43), the INA provides for "Super Penalty" fines of $35,000 on customers and H-1B dependent vendors alike each time a prohibited layoff occurs. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Supporting the town, at least in part, for the U.S. government as an amicus will be Deputy Solicitor General Ian H. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 4:28 am by Nick Basciano
Paul noted that not only does heathcare.gov have major availability issue, but it, just like every other site, suffers from unrelenting cyber threats. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:58 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
 Also, post-Alvarez, if content does not fit within a category of traditionally unprotected speech, legislators face challenges regulating it. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:26 pm
Does a spouse have the obligation to disclose separate property assets in the course of a dissolution proceeding and, if so, what are the remedies for nondisclosure? [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 12:32 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
A typical fee affidavit in a routine debt collection case does not meticulously itemize activities, not to mention incorporate by reference an attached timekeeper or billing sheet. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:20 am by Jane Chong
Does holding software providers accountable for the insecurity of their code amount to going nuclear on the industry—the equivalent of pushing the big red button? [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
The 2011 International Competition Network Good Practices include the following recommendations: “It is good practice to make leniency available both where the agency is unaware of the cartel and where the agency is aware of the cartel but the agency does not have sufficient evidence to proceed to adjudicate or prosecute. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
  Apparently, that process wasn’t very user-friendly – with only 15 paper NDAs between 1962 and 1984, when it was essentially superseded by H-W. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 3:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Section 10.06(h) is not rendered “superfluous,” as the dissent contends, just because it does not cover every conceivable “release” subsequent to section 10.05(b) notice. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:03 am by Ken White
Johnson Utilities — which has a history of suing its critics for defamation — and its owner George H. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Thomson asserted that employee was not covered because he never reported the alleged misconduct to the SEC, as required under Exchange Act Section 21F(h). [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by familoo
The last hurrah of the ancien regime was not so much the failed prosecution of Penguin Books Limited in 1960 for publishing D H Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover but rather the famous – or infamous &ndas [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  (In an appendix, Holt does list and summarize "Major Legislation Related to the Judiciary, 1875-1939.") [read post]