Search for: "IN RE GUESS" Results 8961 - 8980 of 16,472
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
NBA owners/players don't give a damn about fans&and guess what? [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:00 am by LindaMBeale
"  He calls the "occupy wall street" protesters "radicals"--I guess because they are willing to sacrifice personal comfort to bring a non-violent message to the world through their signs and statements about the unfairness of today's society with its gaping inequalities in income and wealth, resulting in an influential 1% that can arrange laws to suit them. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:21 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The reason why the judge quoted Article 23.1 instead of Article 23.2 is anybody's guess. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
Can you guess what that is?] [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:51 am by Nathan
You can probably guess what we think. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 8:43 pm by TDot
After ranting and raving for a bit we’re usually in much better mental shape. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 8:38 pm by Michael Froomkin
They’re pretty smart, so I guess this counts as one vote of confidence. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by Juan Antunez
If you're not going to resign, then you need to think about how you're going to get informed consent for your actions as trustee. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:13 pm by Clif Burns
One can only assume that the Certificate of Insurance said something naughty other than the quoted statement; you’ll just have to guess what it was. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:24 pm
We wouldn't want to guess wrong and have three weeks of garbage piling up. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 11:12 am by Paul Sullivan
And without all that information, any value on a case would just be a guess. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 8:51 am by Dan Markel
Without promising, I'm guessing it will take place the Thursday night, on January 5th, around and following 930pm. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:46 am by Steve McConnell
Naturally, we're confronting the issue all over the place. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Alan Rozenshtein
 Judge Wilkinson interrupts, noting that the Supreme Court has been “very skeptical” of Bivens actions and that, since permitting a Bivens action in this case would impinge on foreign affairs and national security, the Court would thus want evidence of clear congressional authorization for a cause of action and “they’re not going to be sympathetic at all to implied rights of action. [read post]