Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 8961 - 8980
of 21,697
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
" Id. at 998 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm
The first Wegmans store opened in 1930 in Rochester, NY and the company currently boasts nearly 80 stores spread over five states. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:56 am
” In just under two weeks, the Court will hear oral arguments in Evenwel v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:59 pm
See State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 2:24 pm
Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 2:24 pm
Rodriguez v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 4:25 am
State of N.Y. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:05 pm
That would be its high-water mark. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:12 am
S. 428, 443 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted); Mitchell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:56 am
a chance to make comments by email here so that the Office can decide whether to take a position on it.For the record, Article 27 states: "The date of filing of a Community trade mark application shall be the date on which documents containing the information specified in Article 26(1) [= application details + request for grant + fee] are filed with the Office by the applicant or, if the application has been filed with the central office of a Member State or with the… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
The doctrine applies “where the issue in the second action is identical to an issue which was raised, necessarily decided and material in the first action, and the party who is being estopped had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the earlier action” (Simmons v Trans Express Inc., 37 NY3d 107, 112 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Molnar v JRL S. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:05 am
Janus v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
But jurisdictional objections are another matter, as the United States explains in its opposition brief: 1. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:56 am
By: Mark M. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:56 am
By: Mark M. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:10 am
Smith Religions and law: current challenges in Latin America, Juan Navarro Floria State and religion in Europe, Giuseppe Casuscelli States and religions in post-Communist Europe, Giovanni Barberini The recent developments of church-state relations in Central Europe, Balázs Schanda Church and state relations in the Czech Republic and in Slovakia, Antonello De Oto States and churches in Northern Europe: achieving freedom and equality through… [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:51 am
The Defendant filed a federal trademark application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) in May of 2011 to register the “Terrible T-Shirt” phrase as a trademark for use on T-Shirts. [read post]
