Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 8961 - 8980
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
Stock, supra (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:54 am
R (T & Anor) v SSHD & Anor, heard 9 – 10 December 2013. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
Surely, the only thing that matters is that it is just so paw-licking good. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
ICBC appealed that ruling but the matter settled without going to hearing of the appeal. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:07 am
“We welcome the board’s first report on government surveillance practices," said EFF Legislative Analyst Mark Jaycox. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
And it isn’t. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
Compounding matters, Lance also included gratuitous dictum suggesting that a post-sale duty to warn may exist in prescription drug cases, id. at 167-68 – despite that theory being a form of strict liability, which Pennsylvania doesn’t recognize at all in prescription medical product litigation. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 1:18 pm
It won’t. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:44 am
The small matter of whether the marks HOT POCKETS and POCKET SANDWICHES are similar as a legal matter. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:44 am
How you say it matters — isn’t that at least half the game when it comes to “bullying,” after all? [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:15 pm
Emeritus Kat blogger Mark Schweizer is one of the starts of the programme, which we hope you will support. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:25 pm
On 1 July last year, the IPKat carried a note, "When groovy fingers don't make for good trade marks", by young barrister Katherine Moggridge (a pupil at 3 New Square) on a decision of the United Kingdom's Trade Mark Registry, O-237-13 Société des Produuits Nestlé SA's application; opposition of Cadbury UK Ltd. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 8:56 am
” (Should that matter? [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:14 am
Even looking at Asiarim’s claim to own the marks to one licensor and one potential licensor, that wasn’t disseminated to the public. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:17 am
R (T & Anor) v SSHD & Anor, heard 9 – 10 December 2013. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
The court noted that "[p]ublic allegations that someone is involved in crime generally are speech on a matter of public concern" and "even consumer complaints of non-criminal conduct by a business can constitute matters of public concern." [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 6:04 am
Simmons, Mark J. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:08 pm
“[I]t may have been thought that there were enough [milk producers] in the field already. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 3:30 am
Mark Tushnet Every once in a while you read an article that makes you smack your head and say, “Duh—this is so obvious (and obviously right)—that I can’t understand why I didn’t see it before. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:52 pm
Stop mass surveillance of digital communications and communication records.It doesn’t matter what legal authority is being cited—whether it’s the Patriot Act, the FISA Amendments Act, or an executive order—the government should not be sweeping up massive amounts of information by and about innocent people first, then sorting out whether any of its targets are included later. [read post]
