Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption" Results 8961 - 8980 of 22,033
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2010, 9:19 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Bayer CropScience AG) There is a new reference for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of the term "civil and commercial matters" which has been referred to the ECJ by the Supreme Court of the Netherlands (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden) asking inter alia the following question: Is the phrase 'civil and commercial matters' in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and… [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs, defendants, and lower courts are now faced with a double source of uncertainty: it is not clear which of the courts’ rules applies, and each of the rules is itself vague. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:15 am by Kyle Hulehan
Therefore, Congress needs to devise a strategy to either adopt Pillar Two or another domestic tax regime that avoids a complicated mess for U.S. companies. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:30 pm by Gene Quinn
In so holding, Tamoxifen adopted a rule of near per se legality for a practice akin to a naked market division scheme, a horizontal agreement that seems anticompetitive on its face. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 10:46 am by Robert Kreisman
On Jan. 1, 2011, Illinois adopted Rule 805 of its Rules of Evidence, which provided that “hearsay included within hearsay are not excluded under the hearsay rule if each part of the combined statements conforms an exception to the hearsay rule provided in these rules. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:43 am by Zach Kiffmeyer
  We are closely following this decision and any related matters. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:28 am by Ron Coleman
 Its jurisdiction, of course, is plenary with respect to the discretionary matter of an award of fees. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:28 am by Ron Coleman
 Its jurisdiction, of course, is plenary with respect to the discretionary matter of an award of fees. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:41 am by Cristina Mariottini
The possibility to re-open proceedings in breach of the ECHR was not contemplated by the previous rules applicable to the matter, and the Italian Constitutional Court had excluded that the obligation of Contracting States to conform to the judgments of the ECtHR could imply the need to review national res judicata in civil or administrative law matters. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:23 pm
Well it sometimes does matter. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:55 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
As failing to comply with the amended rules effective February 17, 2010 can trigger obligations under the Breach Regulations and other exposures, prompt action to manage risk under both the Breach Regulations and the revised HIPAA rules is critical to minimize Covered Entity and business associate exposures under both these rules. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Under the Uniform Parentage Act, which California has adopted by statute, biological mothers and “presumed parents” have parental rights. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
We have previously blogged about the original House version of the Act and the changes the Senate adopted, which changes were enacted into law. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:44 pm
Ultimately, court-watchers came away with no clear sense of how the California Supreme Court might rule. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:22 am by Victoria VanBuren
The next critique was aimed at the procedural measures adopted by the majority. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by David Hart QC
(the judge had ruled that the claimants had to prove that they had been affected for at least 52 days a year before they could establish a nuisance. vi) By adopting such a threshold, the judge deprived at least some of the claimants of their right to have their individual cases assessed on their merits. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:52 am
Under the CCA’s Miscellaneous Rule 08-101, adopted June 23, 2008, any motion relating to a death sentence is deemed untimely if filed less than 48 hours before 6 p.m. on the scheduled execution date. [read post]