Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 8961 - 8980
of 55,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2007, 4:33 am
Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254, 57 S.Ct. 163, 81 L.Ed. 153 (1936) (reasoning "the power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants"), with Mountain Pure, LLC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:48 pm
” Friedman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:07 pm
River Center LLC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 6:42 am
116: M.Nagaraj v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
On 2nd November 2015 the Supreme Court heard the case of Regina (Wang Yam) v the Central Criminal Court and Her Majesty’s Attorney General. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 11:26 am
Mandel, which decided that the power to exclude aliens is a power inherent to every sovereign state, were heavily discussed during the arguments. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
In Weinstat v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
In Securities Exchange Commission v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:30 pm
" In Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, we seek to hold former Attorney General John Ashcroft responsible for the detention of Abdullah al-Kidd, an innocent American citizen who was wrongfully imprisoned under the material witness statute. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:42 pm
The problem of lower earning power is exacerbated by child care responsibilities. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:54 am
The Supreme Court begins a two-day hearing in the high-profile case of Julian Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority today. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 1:18 pm
Loveday v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
Supreme Court profoundly impacts the balance of power among the branches of our government. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 9:24 pm
Supreme Court profoundly impacts the balance of power among the branches of our government. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:01 pm
Terry v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm
Smith v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
In practice in the Court of Appeal the power is only exercised where some decisive authority has been overlooked so that the appeal is bound to fail, or where the court has been misled…in an application under section 13, unless it is clear that the respondent can deliver a knockout blow, the court should use its case management powers to adjourn an application to set aside to be heard with the substantive application”. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:41 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
The Chief Justice’s order also uses the scheduling power for a purpose that it is hard to see as within the scope of that power. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:33 pm
FEC, Burwell v. [read post]
