Search for: "R. D. C." Results 8961 - 8980 of 20,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
The closest guess was just $26.03, from Dan C. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
The closest guess was just $26.03, from Dan C. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But none reached the market despite millions in R&D from National Institute of Justice. [read post]
16 May 2012, 10:27 pm
Sólo en el año 2009, los asaltantes robaron mercancía de camiones comerciales por valor de casi $500 millones de dólares, lo que representa un salto de 67% en robos comparado con el año 2008. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 7:31 pm by Robert McKennon
Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones last week announced that Governor Jerry Brown has signed AB 1747, authored by Assembly Member Mike Feuer (D-Los Angeles). [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
So you’d think the federal Department of Justice would be rushing to protect the Crown’s case. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:30 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Full Expensing of Research & Development (R&D) Expenditures Under current law, companies can deduct the cost of spending on research and development (R&D) immediately. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:41 am
Quel que soit le système qu’ils appliquent pour calculer la compensation équitable, les États membres sont tenus de respecter un juste équilibre entre les personnes concernées, c’est-à-dire, d’une part, les titulaires de droits de propriété intellectuelle lésés par l’exception de copie privée, bénéficiaires de ladite compensation, et, d’autre part, les… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
Int’l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Kentucky: Was this award for counsel fees ‘exceptional’ or less? [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Kentucky: Was this award for counsel fees 'exceptional' or less? [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 9:55 am
‘(D) Any activity in support of any service described in subparagraphs (A) through (C). [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 1:03 pm by Geoffrey Manne
  The R&S argument goes, in essence: a) a firm has an ethics code, waivers of which must be disclosed immediately; b) the code “should” prohibit related-party transactions but it does not on its face; c) there is a related-party transaction; d) there is no disclosure of a waiver; e) 406 is violated because the code of ethics “should” have prohibited this transaction, thus it “should” have required a waiver, and thus the absence… [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:00 am by Doug Cornelius
For me, the biggest concern is the overhang of the proposed changes to Regulation D that were put up for comment at the same time the SEC lifted the ban. [read post]