Search for: "State v House" Results 8961 - 8980 of 28,338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 6:35 am by Adam Wagner
He said that his hand were tied as The scope of the Convention jurisdiction within the meaning of Article 1 has been addressed by the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Bankovic, and by the House of Lords and the Supreme Court respectively in Al-Skeini and Smith v Oxfordshire. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:56 am
  Having the state Supreme Court agree to take up the matter is a victory of a sort, I guess, but is kind of like standing in the charred, smoking remains of your burned-up house and finding that the box with your award ribbons from sixth grade music camp made it unharmed. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 3:45 pm
News Busters It has been nearly three years since the Kelo v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:56 pm
  Having the state Supreme Court agree to take up the matter is a victory of a sort, I guess, but is kind of like standing in the charred, smoking remains of your burned-up house and finding that the box with your award ribbons from sixth grade music camp made it unharmed. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Wen Fa looks ahead to next week’s oral argument in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:42 pm by Patricia Salkin
Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. brought action against the Village of Pomona challenging certain zoning and environmental ordinances under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), the Fair Housing Act (FHA), and New York state law. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am by NL
The property was a mid terrace Victorian house on 3 levels (basement, ground and first). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am by NL
The property was a mid terrace Victorian house on 3 levels (basement, ground and first). [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:49 am by Ilya Somin
" Her endorsement of a relatively narrow definition of "public use" that excludes private "economic development" takings is at odds with her opinion for the Court in Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 12:10 pm by Giles Peaker
Suffice it to say at this juncture that the law is settled in this area: the Supreme Court having reconsidered the requirement that all tenancies must be for a term certain, and giving the rule renewed (if, it must be said, grudging) approval in Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd v Berrisford(2012) 1 AC 955. [read post]