Search for: "State v. Bill"
Results 8961 - 8980
of 19,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2020, 7:41 am
DISH wrote off that amount but continued to bill the plaintiff the monthly fee for the pause program. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
At Fox News, Bill Mears reports that “[t]he last scheduled oral argument of the term appeared divided along the usual conservative-liberal lines. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:26 am
The first is Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:08 am
The Respondent’s base of operations is the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 9:42 am
In V-1 Oil Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 9:21 am
See Austin v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
This will be the first time Congress votes on a bill to restore and update the protections of the Voting Rights Act since the Supreme Court crippled the law in the 2013 decision of Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:20 am
Currently there is a bill before the Duma which would allow the Russian Constitutional Court to block the ECHR rulings. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am
However, the Court of Appeals instructs that FOIL is to be "liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 12:57 pm
In Viot v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:06 pm
California; and (2) whether the Navajo Nation can state a cognizable claim for breach of trust consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 5:31 am
Supreme Court's recent prison overcrowding case of Brown v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Unless a convention of the states assembled pursuant to Article V proceeds to ignore the language of Article V, the current structure of the Senate cannot be changed, and even permissible amendments will need the assent of 38 states. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:27 pm
The New York Legal Assistance Group (NYLAG) represents the plaintiffs in the suit, Belovic v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:21 am
’ ” United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
At that point Easterbrook noted that the Ninth Circuit, quoting Washington v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 9:19 pm
The practice of giving the other side’s bill a dirty name is now a common tactic. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:36 pm
Shapo, Constitutional Tort: Monroe v. [read post]
