Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 8961 - 8980 of 15,310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
§2B1.1(b)(11)(C), because this provision does not apply to personal tax returns. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Level One Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The surveillance aspects to these orders follow the precedent set in Howlett v Holding [2006] EWHC 41 (QB) where Eady J stated: Holding has revealed that he has had Mrs Howlett watched at various times and wishes to retain his right to do so, whatever anxiety and distress that may cause her [16]. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:56 am by NL
At issue were the Circuit Judge’s findings that Bury had: a) failed to give advice to Mr Gibbon on first application as homeless as required by para 2.12 of the Homeless Code of Guidance for Local Authorities b) should have addressed this failure in their s.202 review, but failed to do so c) failed to address an error in the s.184 decision as to the level of savings held by Mr Gibbon in the s.202 review d) failed to hold an oral hearing… [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 7:08 am by Joy Waltemath
Ultimately, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the injunction as to: Section 2(c), suspending entry of nationals from the six designated countries for 90 days; Section 6(a), suspending USRAP for 120 days; and Section 6(b), capping the entry of refugees to 50,000 in the fiscal year 2017. [read post]