Search for: "State v. Code" Results 8961 - 8980 of 27,233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2013, 2:00 am by koherston
The preamble of the bill unfairly indicts honorable judges all across Tennessee when it states “the General Assembly finds that Tennesseans with disabilities have suffered invidious discrimination in child welfare and custody proceedings throughout the State on account of such disability. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 7:17 pm by Michael Lowe
Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., 770 F.2d 399, 407 (4th Cir. 1985) and United States v. [read post]
These developments impact many SaaS providers, especially due to the expanded nexus provisions that many states are enacting after the United States Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:25 am
Conduct, 45 AD3d 927, 929 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 701 [2008]; Matter of Ostad v New York State Dept. of Health, 40 AD3d at 1253; Matter of Corines v State Bd. for Professional Med. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:14 am
(a)) and one count of possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Safety Code, § 11359).Key pled guilty to possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Safety Code, § 11359) in exchange for an agreement that the People would dismiss the remaining count and that Key would be sentenced to time served in local custody and placed on probation.People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
In the second, Just Yorkshire v The Times, IPSO was satisfied that a correction to the online version of the article and a notification in the Corrections and Clarifications column was sufficient to remedy the breach of the code. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 7:20 pm by Anthony Zaller
Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 692, 66 S.Ct. 1187, 90 L.Ed. 1515 (1946), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in IBP, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
… [48] Moreover, as stated earlier, when determining whether to grant a stay, preference should be given to the proceedings which are more comprehensive of the two. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:54 am by Anna Christensen
Section 233(a) of Title 42 of the United States Code provides that recovery against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) “shall be exclusive of any other civil action or proceeding” in cases seeking damages for injuries resulting from medical treatment provided by an employee of the U.S. [read post]