Search for: "State v. Favors"
Results 8961 - 8980
of 37,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2019, 5:54 am
The guidance describes five “essential components” of an effective sanctions compliance program: (i) management commitment, (ii) risk assessment, (iii) internal controls, (iv) testing and audit, and (v) training. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:35 am
In Strickhausen v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:15 pm
Samsung or Oracle v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:13 am
In Himsel v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:26 am
The district court ruled in favor of the correctional officers based on the Eleventh Circuit’s precedence in O’Bryant v Finch. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:40 am
Dodelson v AC Holdco, Inc. [read post]
27 May 2019, 10:16 am
E.E.O.C. v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 10:14 am
Additional Resources: People v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am
The last explores the exploitation of California law by plaintiffs who can use internet accessibility claims to bring the whole world into their favorable local courts. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:20 am
EklecCo NewCo LLC v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:52 pm
(…) We do not find the Explanatory Notes to be decisive in favor of either party. [read post]
26 May 2019, 12:29 pm
Maryland requiring prosecutors to disclose, upon request by the defendant, any evidence favorable to the defense. [read post]
26 May 2019, 5:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:19 am
In Reed v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 5:30 am
(holding affidavit statement that customer "did not agree to the terms of any credit card" did not defeat summary judgment in creditor’s favor); also see Houle v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:35 pm
Hodgkinson won in State v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
If opinions from the Lone Star State's highest court such as the one just handed down in Scripps NP Operating LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:20 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
” “”An account stated is an agreement between the parties to an account based upon prior transactions between them with respect to the correctness of the separate items composing the account and the balance due, if any, in favor of one party or the other” (Shea & Gould v Burr, 194 AD2d 369, 370 [1st Dept 1993] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
