Search for: "State v. L. A. T."
Results 8961 - 8980
of 9,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
I used the Navy JAG's recent reversal of the United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:49 pm
L. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 5:36 am
” Juen v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
James L. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
A wrap-up essay will then focus on some potentially constructive policy reforms that could assist media enterprises without a massive infusion of state support or regulation of the press. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 2:03 pm
L. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:02 pm
" TrafFix Devices Inc. v. [read post]
More Money, More Problems: Courts Scrutinize High Attorneys’ Fees Awards in Class Action Settlements
1 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
In Lowery v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 3:50 am
In a report and recommendation dated September 11, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge James L. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 1:38 pm
” (SABAM v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:12 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 3:42 pm
Ct. 1705, 1722, 60 L. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 3:13 pm
In Dahlia v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 10:30 am
Boston Red Sox Baseball Club Limited Partnership v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:45 am
Macy, former NASA employee Clifford L. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 10:02 pm
Scott v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 8:13 am
In its 2015 decision in Burton v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:43 am
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that, “if this isn’t an appeal to how to vote [something that federal law makes eligible for regulation], I don’t understand what is. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Moving to the 1980s: it took empowering the courts with the Charter before bar entrance requirements banning non-citizens and bans on inter-provincial law firms were removed (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia [1989] 1 SCR 143 and Black v Law Society of Alberta [1989] 1 SCR 591, respectively). [read post]
