Search for: "State v. Mai" Results 8961 - 8980 of 133,174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2014, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
A regulation of speech is overbroad if constitutionally-protected expression may be `chilled’ by the provision because it facially “prohibits a real and substantial amount of” expression guarded by the 1st Amendment (People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:03 am by Derk A. Wadas
Proving that the Fourth Amendment is not just a myth, the Second Court of Appeals in Fort Worth, Texas issued its opinion on Friday in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) heard another appeal in the Cleveland Clinic v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 6:42 pm by Sme
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (U.S., June 27, 2018) (States and public-sector unions may not extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees: it is a violation of the First Amendment (overturning Abood v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm by Dennis Crouch
As she has done with past cases, Jill Browning provides the following same-day analysis of the Supreme Court oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
As she has done with past cases, Jill Browning provides the following same-day analysis of the Supreme Court oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 5:25 pm
Vliet, 148 Fla. 568, 4 So.2d 862 (Fla. 1941); United States Fidelity & Guar. v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am by Colby Pastre
States were never intended to tax international income, and doing so raises serious constitutional issues in many states. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
OCA's treatment of its May 27 constructive denial as a final agency determination is inconsistent with its statements notifying petitioner that it had opportunities for further administrative appeals (see Matter of Carter v State of N.Y., Exec. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
OCA's treatment of its May 27 constructive denial as a final agency determination is inconsistent with its statements notifying petitioner that it had opportunities for further administrative appeals (see Matter of Carter v State of N.Y., Exec. [read post]