Search for: "State v. Stai" Results 8961 - 8980 of 16,603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2012, 8:00 pm by Jeff Lorenzo
Congress also voted in December to stay permitting of logging roads, a measure that will expire October 1, 2012. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports that the State of Washington filed its brief yesterday in Doe #1 v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 11:39 am by Stephen Bilkis
Based on Domestic Relations Law § 170[7] and as discussed in Granger v Granger, the court observed that the State of New York has approved of "no fault" divorces. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:59 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Anthony Kennedy provided the crucial vote: He believed that the justices should stay out of the Pennsylvania case but left open the possibility that courts could review similar cases in the future. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm by Amy Howe
Many court-watchers thought that the justices might settle the issue of partisan gerrymandering once and for all, or at the very least provide more guidance, last term, in Gill v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
The court states generically that access to information has to be restricted in order to support a CFAA claim, but there wasn’t much discussion about what form the restriction had to take. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Daniel Tokaji
In Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:17 pm by The Murray Law Firm
This unethical and unprofessional activity on the part of the lawyer is good sign that you should stay away. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:17 pm by The Murray Law Firm
This unethical and unprofessional activity on the part of the lawyer is good sign that you should stay away. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
 The cautious conclusion of a recent paper by the UPC is that “it seems not per se legally impossible that the UK can stay within the UPCA [UPC agreement], even when not an EU Member State”. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 8:40 pm
As the State's opposition in Brewer correctly notes, there is a dynamic tension between the cornerstone of Texas capital jurisprudence, Jurek v. [read post]