Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8961 - 8980
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2012, 10:39 am
United States, California v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:19 am
United States of America v. 32.42 Acres of Land, et al., Case No. 10-56568 (9th Cir. 2012). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
United States' (293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
United States' (293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am
The average cost of winning a seat in the state legislature in 2010, for instance, ranged from $711,000 in California to a remarkable $773 in New Hampshire. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am
The average cost of winning a seat in the state legislature in 2010, for instance, ranged from $711,000 in California to a remarkable $773 in New Hampshire. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:06 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:05 am
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has video of a recent conference of privacy law scholars on the “mosaic theory” of Fourth Amendment searches, which was embraced by the two concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:09 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:20 pm
In Dixon v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 6:46 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California made quick work of the Complaint, ultimately dismissing it for failure to state a claim. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:23 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:55 pm
” National Bank v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm
The summary at the opinion’s outset says it simply: “In this appeal, we address whether the renewal of forty-one water supply contracts by the United States Bureau of Reclamation violates § 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:59 am
Ct. 1662 (2010), the United States Supreme Court considered a fee award in a class action civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. section 1983. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:04 am
As explained in Part I, California v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:48 pm
County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm
The brief comes as a response to a recent decision by the Second Circuit to limit the protections under Section 109 of the Copyright Act to works created within the United States in John Wiley & Sons v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
(I'll leave for another day her implicit claim that the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari in this case and overrule X.)But Justice Liu is also correct. [read post]
