Search for: "Williams v. State" Results 8961 - 8980 of 12,088
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
One New Jersey appellate court upheld the disqualification of an expert witness who had worked for the State of New Jersey on a case that involved confidential disclosures by the State’s lawyers and its agencies, which disclosures were necessarily involved in the expert witness’s subsequent retention by the State’s adversary in a different case.[10] This decision, like most in this area, turned on a close analysis of the facts and circumstances of the… [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
* * * In 2002, after my wife and I had sufficiently recovered from Bush v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:34 am
Question 5: Whether it is appropriate to reconsider State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:48 am by William G. Ross
  During the next four years, the Court’s decisions, particularly Miranda v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 9:23 am by Lyle Denniston
The challengers rely heavily upon a ruling in 2000 by the Supreme Court, in Rice v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Jason Jordan, University of North Texas: De Jure Blackness: Racialization in Brown v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
Former Chief Justice William Rehnquist wrote the majority opinion in the seminal case of Seminole Tribe of Florida v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 7 February 2023, the Federal Court of Australia found in favour of Papua New Guinea energy minister William Duma in the case of Duma v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 3) [2023] FCA 47. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
” He did so even though the question of whether the children of people not lawfully in the United States became citizens at birth was resolved more than 100 years ago.In United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Williams, No. 06-694 A statute criminalizing, in certain specified circumstances, the pandering or solicitation of child pornography is neither overbroad under the First Amendment nor impermissibly vague under the Due Process Clause. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:05 am by Frank Cranmer
We in this country continue to owe a debt to the jury which in 1670 refused to convict the Quakers William Penn and William Mead for preaching ideas which offended against state orthodoxy” If the manifestation of religion in the form of street preaching is deemed offensive to some then the notion that the law would not protect such individuals as posited by Sedley L.J would not be worth having at all. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:23 am by admin
In this case it was very helpful to have Judge Timothy Williams as our settlement judge. [read post]