Search for: ""duty to warn""
Results 881 - 900
of 1,332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2008, 10:19 am
If she had not been adequately warned about the dangers that allegedly were associated with the specified medications, that would supposedly impact a duty owed to Mr. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:35 am
Thus, Johnson & Johnson had a duty to warn Duffy of the risks associated with the use of the patch. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 6:47 am
” Further, the trial court held that defendant “did not have a duty to warn Plaintiff that the bag of ice might drip when it was lifted because the condition of the bag of ice was equally available to be noticed by both [defendant] and the plaintiff. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 9:19 am
The jury must decide whether Merck had a duty to warn about Fosamax before then, he said in an Aug. 5 ruling. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:02 am
It is unclear how that translates into a duty to warn her of anything. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 4:16 am
The duty of reasonable care includes a duty to warn passengers of dangers not apparent and obvious. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 9:19 am
The jury must decide whether Merck had a duty to warn about Fosamax before then, he said in an Aug. 5 ruling. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 2:10 pm
The others are product liability cases where it is the duty to warn that is non-delegable. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:36 am
And the argument is that the Tarasoff duty to warn is at fault. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:45 am
Moreover, the law imposes no duty to warn about risks that are known or obvious. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 11:34 am
PLIVA then moved for summary judgment based on lack of proximate cause.The court first noted that the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals had held that drug manufacturers had a duty to warn consumers but had not clarified whether they also had a duty to warn the physician. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
The plaintiff further reasons that such knowledge on the part of [defendant] gave rise to an ongoing duty to warn the purchasers and recipients of such copied products manufactured by other companies. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
That’s the same duty-to-warn-about-anything-that’s-foreseeable argument that’s at the core of innovator liability claims. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 11:12 am
While the duty to warn may run only to the prescriber, causation can be severed at any point, and here the FDA-mandated patient brochure skipped over the prescriber and adequately warned the patient a [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Well, first the learned intermediary rule means that the duty to warn only runs to prescribers, not patients, so prescription medical product warnings are judged by what such learned intermediaries are expected to know and respond to. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 10:58 am
She claimed there should be a duty to warn about possible risks of possible off-label uses. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 2:14 pm
While a manufacturer may argue that their particular component design is perfectly safe when used properly, they have a duty to warn consumers of potential, known risks associated with misuse of the product. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 12:08 pm
The parties we represent – drug manufacturers – do not publish these things, and they generally don’t have any duty to warn patients anyway. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
But nothing in Oklahoma law suggests “any duty of a pharmacy to prevent a patient from, or warn a patient about, combining prescription drugs. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 9:29 am
“According to the learned intermediary doctrine, where a defendant manufactures a product which is dispensed to patients by doctors, rather than directly, the defendant has a duty to warn only the doctor, rather than the patients of any risks associated with the product’s use. [read post]
