Search for: "-LRA Wells v. King"
Results 881 - 900
of 3,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
Niska and Arneson v. 281 Care Committee); A conversion therapy case (King v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
, pens this post about the well-known and much-debated issue of the product plain packaging [on which see earlier Katposts here, here, here, and here].* Court of Appeal dismisses Rovi's claim construction attempt in battle with VirginA few days ago the Court of Appeal of England and Wales handed down its decision in Rovi Guides Inc v Virgin Media Ltd & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 1214. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:00 am
In most practices areas, facts are king. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:00 am
In most practices areas, facts are king. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:00 am
In most practices areas, facts are king. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:20 am
Back in 1981, so more than 40 years ago, in Beck v. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 7:47 am
Huawei, involves leveraged financial engineering behind patent lawsuits) as well as the Munich I Regional Court's 10-year anniversary, and forthcoming SEP-related extension, of its Local Patent Rules.For your convenience, here's a list of the six previous posts on the UK hearing:Judicial imperialist Birss rewound 3,000 years to crown himself King Solomon of FRANDland--dethronement is nigh: Unwired Planet v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 9:51 am
Trimboli v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 2:22 pm
Heller represented MCM v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm
On September 30, 2009, the plaintiff filed DD v SK and MR, in Supreme Court, Kings County, bearing Index Number 24694/2009. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 8:10 am
Qui tam is short for the Latin phrase qui tam pro domino rege quam pro si ipso in hac parte sequitur, which means "who pursues this action on our Lord the King's behalf as well as his own. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:48 am
Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:59 pm
It is co-sponsored by the state departments of education for Kansas, Nebraska and Iowa as well as the Mountain Plains Regional Resource Center (or TAESE). [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 11:50 am
King (2006) This 2006 order from the U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:34 pm
As the Court stated in R. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
On King v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:10 am
Here is a well written decision concerning Akin Gump in which some causes of action are dismissed. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:50 pm
., Dr, King) and disliked whites (e.g., Jeffrey Dahmer). [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
Co. v Johnson’s Publ’g Co., 473 F.2d 901, 902 (C.C.P.A. 1973); TMEP § 1207.01. [read post]
