Search for: "ACE Limited" Results 881 - 900 of 2,020
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am by Andres
And it is a decade now since the seminal decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am by INFORRM
After conducting a survey of the classifications used in the authorities including Campbell v MGN [2004] AC 457, Douglas v Hello! [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 3:18 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
The OFCCP derived the 7 percent utilization goal primarily from disability data collected as part of the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS). [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am by DOUGLAS MCGREGOR, BRODIES LLP
When are the limits of reasonable disagreement exceeded? [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
 Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –-Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in… [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 2:57 pm by familoo
Ace isn’t it? [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:09 pm by Patti Waller
An Introduction to ListeriaListeria (pronounced liss-STEER-ē-uh) is a gram-positive rod-shaped bacterium that can grow under either anaerobic (without oxygen) or aerobic (with oxygen) conditions. [4, 18] Of the six species of Listeria, only L. monocytogenes (pronounced maw-NO-site-aw-JUH-neez) causes disease in humans. [18] These bacteria multiply best at 86-98.6 degrees F (30-37 degrees C), but also multiply better than all other bacteria at refrigerator temperatures, something that allows… [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
  Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –-Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in Europe reviewed | Italian baked goods’ trade… [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –- Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in Europe reviewed | Italian baked goods’ trade marks… [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:01 pm
The President's authority and power to give instructions to the Chairman in his role as VP3 and to exercise supervisory authority over him are limited by virtue of Article 23(3) of the European Patent Convention (EPC), which lays down the principle of independence of the Boards.The requirement to disobey an instruction or direction from the President or to fail to provide assistance to the President must also apply where the effects of complying would be indirectly liable to affect the… [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by INFORRM
TM argued, relying on what Lord Denning said in Kanda v Government of Malaya [1962] AC 322, 337-338, that it was unfair for an adjudicatory body to receive evidence or representations from one side behind the back of another. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:27 am by Daniel Shaviro
 But if one views this as unconstitutional, it's unconscionable to let states dodge the rule by playing silly semantic games.)It's easy to conclude that ACS v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:06 am
Mr Battstelli’s letter comes only 3 days after a judgment by a Dutch court that criticised the EPO for limiting staff’s right to strike and for refusing collective bargaining. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
Are there (or should there be) professional standards that set limits on the extent to which a patent consultant may carry out an online search of his client, wonders Neil? [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
§§ 312 and 315, when the only limit in the statute is in Section 314, which is expressly limited to decisions made “under this section” – thus giving the USPTO complete and unreviewable authority under these two sections to reject assertions that the agency previously erred in granting patents. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:31 pm by Daniel Shaviro
 If one takes this view, one may want to apply per-country foreign tax credit limits (whether it's a full credit or an 85% credit). [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm by Giles Peaker
S.11(1A) did not only apply to defects that in the structure and exterior of the building that affected the demise: Although this might be a pragmatic way of limiting the landlord’s liability I cannot find it in the words of the statute. [read post]