Search for: "AMENDMENT TO RULES FOR MANAGEMENT OF COURT FUND"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2014, 6:03 pm
The caller noted that the immigration courts are backlogged for months or years, thus leaving the conditional permanent resident in a legal limbo for an inordinate period. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 6:03 pm
The caller noted that the immigration courts are backlogged for months or years, thus leaving the conditional permanent resident in a legal limbo for an inordinate period. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
The Legislature quickly sought to pre-empt such rules. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
The Legislature quickly sought to pre-empt such rules. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 4:57 pm
Officials plainly violated the First Amendment. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:58 am
The allegations underlying the class action were that the Bank decided to “implement[] a plan to consolidate the trust management activities of other banks it had acquired” and led class members to believe that “their assets were being managed on an individualized basis, when in fact the assets were being invested in shares of the Nations Funds mutual fund, managed by an investment company substantially owned by the Bank. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 10:15 am
SB 7 was apparently enacted to counter the California Supreme Court’s ruling in State Building & Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:53 am
Justice Chaney was very well respected when she was a trial court judge in Los Angeles County Superior Court and her opinions are very well drafted and reasoned. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
There is no bright-line rule for when the fiduciary exception may be applied. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
There is no bright-line rule for when the fiduciary exception may be applied. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
There is no bright-line rule for when the fiduciary exception may be applied. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:06 am
That is, for the court’s majority, a matter of strong principle under the First Amendment’s free-speech guarantee. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:24 am
After a restrictive court ruling in relation to the court’s power to grant free-standing Mareva relief in aid of foreign arbitrations, the legislature amended the International Arbitration Act to confer that power to the courts. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 2:24 am
After a restrictive court ruling in relation to the court’s power to grant free-standing Mareva relief in aid of foreign arbitrations, the legislature amended the International Arbitration Act to confer that power to the courts. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:33 am
By ruling on the narrow procedural ground that Central Laborers had failed to provide evidence of beneficial ownership when it made its demand, the Supreme Court leaves for another day the question of whether the mere right to amend a derivative complaint may permit a stockholder plaintiff to establish a proper purpose. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 5:46 pm
In early 2011, the employer amended its uniform policy to allow headscarves. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
.* BREAKING: AG Szpunar says that fair compensation for private copying can be funded through state budget but amount cannot be established ex anteEleonora reports on Advocate General Maciej Szpunar's Opinion in EGEDA C-470/14 [here], a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Spanish Supreme Court seeking clarification as to whether private copying can be public-funded and, if so, whether its amount can be established ex ante.* Will… [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 am
While one might expect that investors would welcome these reforms, shareholder activists are crying foul because these management bylaw (or charter amendment) proposals have higher ownership thresholds than those that many investors say they prefer. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:04 am
Last month, the PCAOB adopted an amendment to Rule 4003 (as well as proposed a separate amendment to that rule) relating to the timing of certain inspections of registered non-US companies. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 1:28 am
The Committee on Court Administration and Case Management is reviewing this matter and will report back to the full Conference. [read post]
