Search for: "Adam Richards"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,810
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2018, 10:20 am
Executive producer Laurence Colletti, producer Kate Nutting, and particularly redoubtable sound engineer and composer Adam Lockwood turned this from an idea into a show. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:14 am
At least some of that information is part of a subset of classified information deemed so sensitive that it is available only to the so-called “Gang of Eight” in Congress: the majority and minority leader in the House and Senate (Mitch McConnell, Chuck Schumer, Paul Ryan and Nancy Pelosi) and the chair and ranking members of the House and Senate intelligence committees (Nunes, Adam Schiff, Richard Burr and Mark Warner). [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am
” Briefly: At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines the Supreme Court’s “practice of inviting amici to brief and argue cases,” noting that “[s]uch opportunities helped promote several illustrious attorneys’ careers. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
” Additional coverage comes from Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, Richard Wolf at USA Today and Adam Liptak for The New York Times. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 7:22 pm
"Supreme Court Considers a Raucous Party and an Endangered Frog": Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[t]hroughout the lengthy legal battle, the conservative-leaning Supreme Court has loomed as Trump’s best hope. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:18 am
" Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that "Supreme Court to issue final verdict on Trump travel ban. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am
” Additional coverage of the argument comes from Mark Sherman at the Associated Press, Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Richard Wolf for USA Today and Adam Liptak for The New York Times. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 2:00 pm
Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that "Supreme Court struggles with murder suspect's denial. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:46 am
Additional coverage comes from Scott Bomboy at Constitution Daily and Richard Wolf for USA Today, who notes that “[f]ew questions posed to the high court are as basic as this: Who gets to decide whether to admit or contest guilt, the defendant or his defense attorney? [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am
Additional coverage of the grants comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post and Adam Liptak for The New York Times. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 8:46 pm
"Justices to Hear Cases on Voting Rights and Internet Taxes": Adam Liptak has this article in today's edition of The New York Times. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 6:08 am
Alcock, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Tuesday, January 9, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Disclosure, Human rights, No-action letters, Rule 14a-8, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting Compensation Season 2018 Posted by Jeannemarie O’Brien, Adam J. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 6:20 am
" Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that "The right to vote -- or not vote -- divides Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
” Additional coverage of the argument comes from Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Stephen Dinan for The Washington Times, Adam Liptak for The New York Times and Richard Wolf for USA Today. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the justices “seemed inclined to rule that people not listed as authorized drivers on rental car agreements nonetheless have privacy rights when they are pulled over by the police. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:44 pm
"Justices Seem Ready to Back Driver of Rental Car in Privacy Case": Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that in Tharpe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 10:50 am
" Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that "Supreme Court cites juror's racism in death penalty reprieve. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
” At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports on the justices’ recent efforts to “clean up after Congress” by interpreting statutes like the one Justice Samuel Alito “denounced as ’gibberish’” during an oral argument earlier this term. [read post]
