Search for: "Adams v. United States"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
For example, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s 2010 budget is just $400 million.[2] While many look to CPB to fund children’s programming (among its many other activities), its entire budget is no more than a quarter of the total amount of U.S. advertising revenue produced by children’s programming from food and beverages products alone: $1.6 billion in 2006 by the FTC’s most conservative estimates.[3] That comparison illustrates the vital importance of… [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May 14, 2012,… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:40 am
The transcript of oral argument in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 6:06 am
United States, No. 13-7451. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:16 am
By: Adam R. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am
Other coverage comes from Katie Barlow and Nina Totenberg at NPR, while in his “Drama at the Court” series for ISCOTUSnow, Christopher Schmidt looks back at United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
United States Soccer Federation denies extending antitrust immunity to USSF in regulating professional soccer, 18 SPORTS LAWYERS JOURNAL 325 (2011)Caitlin M. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 3:22 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Robert Glicksman analyzes last week’s ruling in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 10:22 am
Constitution for the first time since the 18 paragraph decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
David O’Neil, Assistant to the Solicitor, will argue for 10 minutes for United States as amicus curiae supporting reversal. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sandy said in 2006 what is both undeniable and widely resisted in this moment, even by the most progressive branches of the Left: That the United States has a constitution that may not be worth saving in the twenty-first century, even if it can be. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
The departure from Abdulaziz The Secretary of State relied on Abdulaziz v United Kingdom (1985) 7 EHRR 471 in which the Strasbourg Court held that there was no lack of respect for family life in denying entry to foreign spouses. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
§24-2-1; Adams v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:57 am
What if that country were the United States? [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
One of yesterday’s grants was United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:22 am
ACLU of Kentucky and Van Orden v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm
But, unless I got that part right by accident, how an opinion in this case in 1971 from the Supreme Court of the United States might be “Elizabethan” eluded me. [read post]
