Search for: "Allstate Insurance Co"
Results 881 - 900
of 927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Morgan Keegan & Co., 2014 WL 1375038 (W.D. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Purdue Pharma Co., 297 F. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
By Charlie B. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:10 am
Allstate Insurance Co. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:56 pm
Allstate Ins. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
Allstate Insurance Co., 130 S. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 12:49 pm
Allstate Insurance Co., 536 F.3d 418 (5th Cir. 2008) (interpreting a so-called "parens patriae" action to fall within CAFA's definitions because the "real party in interest" was not the State, but the policyholders on whose behalf the State had sued). [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:02 am
Allstate Insurance Co. rejected the relevance of a state legislature’s subjective intentions when it held that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure trumped a New York law prohibiting certain kinds of class actions. [read post]
25 May 2009, 11:42 am
and Insurance Wars Episode II-or is it really Episode V-the-Decider Strikes Back. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:06 pm
Co., 947 F. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:01 am
Allstate, 561 So.2d 427 (Fla. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 8:58 am
The 1941 case of Klaxon Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm
Allstate Ins. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
Allstate Ins. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm
It started me on my insurance journey. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:19 am
Allstate Ins. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:04 am
Allstate Insurance Co., 559 U.S. 393 (2010), the decision reflects the rejection of a long-held theory that the Erie doctrine requires application of state law class action procedures to certain claims even in federal court. [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:47 am
And in Olympic Holding Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 3:09 am
Lehrer (2006) and Allstate Insurance Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 3:23 pm
Allstate Insurance Co., Justice Scalia explained that because Section 1447(d) must be read in pari materia with Section 1447(c), Section 1447(d) precludes review only of remands based on Section 1447(c) - for present purposes, a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]