Search for: "Arnold v. State"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2008, 12:54 pm
Following an introduction by Sir Hugh Laddie, the chair was taken by Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 2:37 pm
Cullen Howe (moderator and speaker), Arnold & Porter LLP, New York, NYMr. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:24 am
The test which has replaced it is whether a stated remedy in a contract is proportionate to the legitimate interests of the innocent party. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:26 am
He also strongly supported the Pullman Railroad Strike of 1894, led by Eugene V. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:50 pm
On appeal that case became Schindler v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:37 am
Because the Regulation merely limited the "use" of trade marks they did not strip away the trade mark owner;s right to prevent or exclude others from using their mark (citing Arnold J in Pinterest v Premium Interest). [read post]
2 Sep 2006, 9:53 pm
In Hill v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 4:21 pm
Rich v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:01 pm
Massey v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am
COUNSEL: George Nicholas Arnold – Counsel for the Appellant. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
None of the accusations are true, he states. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 8:43 pm
The Roundup Trial: Key Details and Expert Testimony The trial, Barnes v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:55 am
(ii) Summary judgment against Illumina on the basis of issue estoppel The defendants’ application to enter summary judgment in respect of the new claim was brought on the basis of issue estoppel; namely, that it had already been decided that Illumina did not have standing to sue as it was not an exclusive licensee under the patents being enforced and that it should not be entitled to reopen this question.Carr J explained the law on issue estoppel by reference to Keith LJ’s judgment… [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 2:39 pm
In Raw Films Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 7:12 am
Here they are in case you missed them:TRADE MARKSKatfriend Marijus Dingilevskis posted on a recent decision of the Lithuanian Supreme Court, which states that even if a trade mark has been registered in the international register for 40 years, this is no guarantee that a subsequent national designation will be also registered.GuestKat Becky Knott commented on the decision of the 2nd Board of Appeal in case R 609/2021-2 [Volkswagen… [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 4:30 pm
The Wilson appellate distinguished the effect of Family Code section 3651 from the trial court's equitable jurisdiction to forever stay enforcement of the arrears, citing Jackson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:54 am
Consequently, the graphic user interface can, as a work, be protected by copyright if it is its author’s own intellectual creation."... and Munich (the Munich one seems tohave longer legs)Mr Justice Arnold in his 2013 decision in SAS v WPL also conceded [para 27] that:"In the light of a number of recent judgments of the CJEU, it may be arguable that it is not a fatal objection to a claim that copyright subsists in a particular work that the work is not one of the… [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
