Search for: "Baker v. State" Results 881 - 900 of 3,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2012, 1:50 pm by Christopher Danzig
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Andrew Peck, Baker, Baxter, Baxter Baker Sidle Conn & Jones, Computer-assisted review, Conn & Jones, Craig Ball, Document Review, E-Discovery, Electronic Discovery, Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
The Supreme Court has announced that the judgments of the following linked cases, heard 22 – 24 November 2010, will be handed down on Wednesday 13 April 2011 – Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited and others; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited and others (Meridian Limited); and Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited and others (Pretty Polly Limited) . [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:20 pm by Michel-Adrien Sheppard
” You may have also caught the article Santa Claus in court: From bingo prizes to custody hearings by Nathan Baker earlier this week in The Lawyer’s Daily. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm by Taylor Ross
In San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 8:27 am
Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, 148 F.3d 1285, 1299 (11th Cir. 1998); Baker v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 2:29 pm
I trace the doctrinal forebears of Southco to the seminal case of Baker v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
For The Economist, Steven Mazie reports that at Wednesday’s oral argument in Carpenter v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Town of Chester v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Committee for Justice blog, Ashley Baker writes that “many of the initial reactions”  to Monday’s decision in Apple v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:30 am by Victoria VanBuren
  [This is the second installment in a three-part series on the Guest-Post:  States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration:  AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]