Search for: "Barnett v. State" Results 881 - 900 of 1,004
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in the Washington Examiner, Mark Grabowski argues that the justices’ comments during oral argument in Packingham v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The US State Department is to collect via applicants’ social media information for tracking and security purposes – the Social Media Law Bulletin has coverage. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The account at issue in Madden v Midland involved an open-end credit card plan (aka credit card account) and the account was not sold by Bank of America to an unaffiliated national bank, contrary representation by the Curious authors notwithstanding. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:27 am by Venkat Balasubramani
"] Other aspects of the dispute that had intersting and recurring social media tweaks: other public employee cases have raised the similar issue of whether the employee was speaking as a citizen or an employee; the law is employer-favorable, but I would not be surprised to see an appeals court give her another chance (this aspect of the dispute vaguely reminds me of Bland v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  Or as, Professor Steven Barnett put it on Twitter “Today one unaccountable tabloid editor attempts to undermine the integrity of 11 independent judges. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
City of Miami and Wells Fargo & Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
Indeed, it reflects the scholarly consensus of the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment, thanks principally to the writings of Michael Kent Curtis, Akhil Amar, Larry Tribe, John Hart Ely, Jack Balkin, Randy Barnett and others. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:32 am
Barnett - Georgetown UniversityProf. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:05 am by Barry Barnett
(D.N.J.). https://www.linkedin.com/posts/barry-barnett-8313014_us-v-apple-inc-complaint-3-21-24-activity-7176705877624717312-U07k? [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:27 pm
I also thought it would be useful to consider what measures could have been undertaken to prevent the misunderstandings that led to the 3M v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 11:54 am by David Kopel
[Amicus brief in Supreme Court's Second Amendment Rahimi case] This week amicus briefs were filed in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am by Andrew Hamm
United States (Fourth Amendment, electronic privacy), and City of Hays, Kansas v. [read post]