Search for: "Blake v. State"
Results 881 - 900
of 986
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
" State of Indiana v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:31 pm
Blake v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 6:08 pm
Possibly the best bit of irrelevance I stumbled upon was Sanders v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 8:02 am
Blake (not approved for publication)Upon consideration, the motion for partial summary judgment of the defendant ("Schartiger") is GRANTED except as to any claim for compensation due under the terms of the Agent Agreement, and the motion to compel of the plaintiff ("Weaver") is DENIED.This case arose out of the termination of an Agency Agreement (the "Agreement") between Schartiger, owner of an insurance company, and Weaver, a former agent of the company. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:23 am
Maybe in some world where everyone agreed about what the post-Booker structure of sentencing would be, but not here.In United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:21 am
Minnesota (06-8273): "Are state supreme courts required to use the standard announced in Teague v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 9:25 am
Specific jurisdiction may exist where the claim is related to or arises out of the defendant's contacts with the state, or general jurisdiction may exist when the defendant's contacts with the forum state are continuous and systematic. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 5:59 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:12 pm
Under Blakely v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 9:24 am
State, Curtis Medina v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:46 pm
Finally, Doug Berman has this post at Sentencing Law & Policy about how Bockting might apply to Apprendi or Blakely. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 1:28 am
Blake. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 4:28 am
Blake. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 5:54 am
In State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 8:07 am
A key case underlying the opinion is United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 2:14 am
US v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 4:57 am
In the United States District Court, only a few judges (Chasanow, Motz, Bennett, Legg, Blake, Davis, Quarles) regularly direct that their opinions be posted. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term
Commencing March 4, 1877
1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:57 am
The reason links to my work seeking cert in US v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 1:03 pm
Today's challenge for readers: can anyone explain to me how Judge Posner's work for the Seventh Circuit in US v. [read post]
