Search for: "Board of Corrections"
Results 881 - 900
of 13,276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2023, 5:13 pm
In the interaction with ChatGPT, Riehl provided a (correct) URL of a link to the complaint on the Second Amendment Foundation's web site, https://www.saf.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Dkt-1-Complaint.pdf. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am
Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275, 287 (2001) (describing Borak as part of an “acien regime” that the Court has subsequently “abandoned” and “not returned to since”); Correctional Se [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:38 am
Continuous oversight and interpretation of cash flows by board and senior management are essential. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
He had mentioned a board member of an organization who had sold his product to the organization. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:26 am
The Court will consider the following questions: (1) Was the Court of Appeal correct that leave under section 3C of the Immigration Act 1971 can end without service of any notice of decision? [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 12:27 am
Further, the Court states that since the local law was codified, and is not annulled, the determination of the ZBA was correct. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 7:04 am
It has been well-publicized that the Irish Data Protection Commission (“DPC”) has imposed a record €1.2 billion fine and corrective measures under the GDPR against Meta Ireland (“Meta”) in a long-running dispute relating to cross-border data transfers and the EU standard contractual clauses (“SCCs”). [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:04 am
Six days later, the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board deadlocked 2-2, declining to recommend clemency. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:24 am
Following the correct classification codes can also help avoid misclassification fees and fines. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:00 am
" Although the Board identified the correct standard articulated by the Court of Appeals, the Appellate Division concluded that the Board had misapplied "the special errand exception by overlooking the altered temporal scheme of [Detective Sergeant's] travel and significance of the work-related activity performed by claimant for the Employer's benefit upon being contacted by the Employer while on standby. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:00 am
" Although the Board identified the correct standard articulated by the Court of Appeals, the Appellate Division concluded that the Board had misapplied "the special errand exception by overlooking the altered temporal scheme of [Detective Sergeant's] travel and significance of the work-related activity performed by claimant for the Employer's benefit upon being contacted by the Employer while on standby. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:35 am
Where a printed correction might be required to occupy a certain prominence in a traditional newspaper layout, it can be much harder to achieve a similar prominence to readers online. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:16 am
After all, it was possible that the misinformation was minor—perhaps not reliable enough for direct cutting and pasting into a document, but more or less correct. [read post]
30 May 2023, 1:00 pm
The Board strongly encourages pharmacies to immediately review their quality assurance and recall policies and procedures to determine if any corrective action is required. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:04 pm
The school board then switched TJ to a different system that, while not considering race directly, reduced Asian admissions by about a quarter. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
The CMA corrected that mistake after Microsoft pointed it out, and revised the provisional findings. [read post]
27 May 2023, 5:00 am
In addition, the board could improve its annual audit of the supervisor’s records and reports. [read post]
27 May 2023, 5:00 am
In addition, the board could improve its annual audit of the supervisor’s records and reports. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:32 am
Peter managed to squeeze in a few brief remarks about the new Enlarged Board of Appeal decision in case G 2/21 (“plausibility”). [read post]
24 May 2023, 5:16 pm
To avoid the potentially much more significant civil monetary penalties that HIPAA authorizes OCR to impose for such breaches, MedEvolve entered into a resolution agreement with OCR that required MedEvolve to pay OCR $350,000 payment and take a series of corrective actions specified in the corrective action plan included in the resolution agreement. [read post]
