Search for: "Box v. State" Results 881 - 900 of 4,724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
Here is how Tymkovich (who, by the way, argued on behalf of the state of Colorado unsuccessfully in Romer v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:16 pm by ACLU
With the increasing likelihood that the Supreme Court will overturn Roe v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
He then stated that it was for this reason self-represented litigants were generally not entitled to costs. [2] 1465778 Ontario Inc. v. 1122077 Ontario Ltd., 2006 CanLII 35819 (ON CA) [3] Dabbs v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 7:30 am by Douglas A. Berman
Nearly two decades later, the State disclosed eight boxes of previously withheld documents from Glossip’s trial. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:37 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited Advocate General Jääskinen delivered his keenly awaited opinion. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:08 am by Transplanted Lawyer
  Legal libertarians read it to say that the rights are inherent in the people, not in the state, and therefore the state must justify its actions in all cases. [read post]
8 May 2014, 7:14 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This means that if the federal judges (who interpret the Constitution every day) know in their heart of hearts that the defendant did not get a fair trial, they have to sustain the conviction if "fairminded jurists could disagree" about the state court's proper application of constitutional precedent.The case is Matthews v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:00 am by David Fine
Such communications must use the “magic words” articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Buckley v. [read post]